<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Daily Street</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk</link>
	<description>The Daily Street Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:24:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Dark Nature Clothing &#8216;002&#8242; Collection by joely</title>
		<link>http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/2012/01/dark-nature-002-collection/comment-page-1/#comment-31888</link>
		<dc:creator>joely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/?p=43595#comment-31888</guid>
		<description>Fair play scott keep pushing man. The way I see it with alot of the recent comments going up on articles on this site is that design and fashion is like music, what one person likes someone else gunna hate anyway...If people cant give criticism  constructively then it aint worth takin on board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair play scott keep pushing man. The way I see it with alot of the recent comments going up on articles on this site is that design and fashion is like music, what one person likes someone else gunna hate anyway&#8230;If people cant give criticism  constructively then it aint worth takin on board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dark Nature Clothing &#8216;002&#8242; Collection by Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/2012/01/dark-nature-002-collection/comment-page-1/#comment-31884</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/?p=43595#comment-31884</guid>
		<description>As much as I admire Scott replying to criticism I can&#039;t help but feel that he&#039;s missing the point. No one is &#039;hating&#039; on the brand. I just feel that as with every other brand out there you open yourself for critic, whether good or bad and you should take it with a pinch of salt.

A lack of originality shouldn&#039;t be accepted as a norm for a starting brand. If the ideas are there then the first tees will having meaning and a real sense of identity. You can have typographic tees and still have that sense of identity.

it just seems people seem to following the same formula. Simple, simple, simple. SNORE. The reason why the UK is coming out with so much and rarely standing toe to toe with US companies, yes, even start ups is because their seems to be an issue emerging with standing out from the rest yet this need to be cool and own a &#039;clothing company&#039;. It&#039;s the new &#039;being a photographer&#039;. It seems to be all inspired from US labels and very safe. Nothing wrong with engineering a release so that it&#039;s sellable and not a risk but, who the hell wants &#039;safe&#039; design. Balls on the line design will bring more respect. If an identity isn&#039;t clear or meaningful then why would anyone care between this and the next. It&#039;s not &#039;hating&#039;. It&#039;s knowing the difference between a brand that has legs and a brand that isn&#039;t proving itself. The only form identity I can see through the line is the &#039;South Division&#039; tag, which I like, that goes for the dogtags. I like the idea of having essentially this movement. A community formed through clothing. I like that. It&#039;s an idea but I wish there was more to that. Maybe you will in the next drop. Would be interesting to see wether that&#039;s something you deem of importance.

Again, Supreme, Only, Hundreds, Parra, Nike, Vans, every single company is open for critic. I think most have reasons for disliking what they see or being indifferent as they do if they love it. It&#039;s not hating. It&#039;s having an opinion and putting it out there for you guys to see and maybe, possibly learn from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I admire Scott replying to criticism I can&#8217;t help but feel that he&#8217;s missing the point. No one is &#8216;hating&#8217; on the brand. I just feel that as with every other brand out there you open yourself for critic, whether good or bad and you should take it with a pinch of salt.</p>
<p>A lack of originality shouldn&#8217;t be accepted as a norm for a starting brand. If the ideas are there then the first tees will having meaning and a real sense of identity. You can have typographic tees and still have that sense of identity.</p>
<p>it just seems people seem to following the same formula. Simple, simple, simple. SNORE. The reason why the UK is coming out with so much and rarely standing toe to toe with US companies, yes, even start ups is because their seems to be an issue emerging with standing out from the rest yet this need to be cool and own a &#8216;clothing company&#8217;. It&#8217;s the new &#8216;being a photographer&#8217;. It seems to be all inspired from US labels and very safe. Nothing wrong with engineering a release so that it&#8217;s sellable and not a risk but, who the hell wants &#8217;safe&#8217; design. Balls on the line design will bring more respect. If an identity isn&#8217;t clear or meaningful then why would anyone care between this and the next. It&#8217;s not &#8216;hating&#8217;. It&#8217;s knowing the difference between a brand that has legs and a brand that isn&#8217;t proving itself. The only form identity I can see through the line is the &#8216;South Division&#8217; tag, which I like, that goes for the dogtags. I like the idea of having essentially this movement. A community formed through clothing. I like that. It&#8217;s an idea but I wish there was more to that. Maybe you will in the next drop. Would be interesting to see wether that&#8217;s something you deem of importance.</p>
<p>Again, Supreme, Only, Hundreds, Parra, Nike, Vans, every single company is open for critic. I think most have reasons for disliking what they see or being indifferent as they do if they love it. It&#8217;s not hating. It&#8217;s having an opinion and putting it out there for you guys to see and maybe, possibly learn from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dark Nature Clothing &#8216;002&#8242; Collection by HighC</title>
		<link>http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/2012/01/dark-nature-002-collection/comment-page-1/#comment-31879</link>
		<dc:creator>HighC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/?p=43595#comment-31879</guid>
		<description>@Scott....Fair play for saying it how it is, you&#039;re a young brand, still growing. You&#039;ve taken on board what people have said and sadly people still hate!!
Those people obviously don&#039;t have the passion and the guts to take the plunge and try to build a sucessful streetwear brand, anyone involved in it, Im working on my first collection and it ain&#039;t easy! So keep doing what you do! You&#039;ll be the one laughing at the end of the day! HC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Scott&#8230;.Fair play for saying it how it is, you&#8217;re a young brand, still growing. You&#8217;ve taken on board what people have said and sadly people still hate!!<br />
Those people obviously don&#8217;t have the passion and the guts to take the plunge and try to build a sucessful streetwear brand, anyone involved in it, Im working on my first collection and it ain&#8217;t easy! So keep doing what you do! You&#8217;ll be the one laughing at the end of the day! HC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dark Nature Clothing &#8216;002&#8242; Collection by zeezee</title>
		<link>http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/2012/01/dark-nature-002-collection/comment-page-1/#comment-31857</link>
		<dc:creator>zeezee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/?p=43595#comment-31857</guid>
		<description>zzzz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zzzz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dark Nature Clothing &#8216;002&#8242; Collection by Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/2012/01/dark-nature-002-collection/comment-page-1/#comment-31847</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/?p=43595#comment-31847</guid>
		<description>Thanks to everyone for the kind words, and everyone for the negative as well. I guess i cant always please everyone, and i&#039;m sorry i am not doing it with enough originality. This is my 2nd collection, or even shall i say my first real collection seeing as the introductory pieces were just a 1 design t-shirt, but i would like to think i&#039;ve expanded to bigger things. 
I kept with the &#039;Triangles and Circles&#039; because its something i have not used to its full potential yet. It was the original emblem we pushed before the first garment was even dropped, and its worked. 
Critism comes with everything i guess, and i can only do what i can do! I have a solid background, and a solid unit of support and i appreciate everyone for that. The collection so far has gone done insanely well and i&#039;m now already pushing for the 003 collection which is due some time this Summer. 
If it&#039;s still not good enough for you, then i guess i cant do much about that. I&#039;m doing the same as everyone else, running a brand like i should be, and pushing garments i believe can do well. In the reality, not everyone will like it, and i take that with a pinch of salt. I&#039;m the same with other brands. Not everyone can like it. Lets get over it and keep the bitching and slagging down. I appreciate all feedback, good or bad, but what i dont like to read is people seeming to slag it for its &#039;un originality&#039; or its &#039;gay&#039; name. Think what you think, but it wont give you any scene points for putting your negative approach in. Hate it, or dislike it, whatever you like, just back it up with a genuine reason. I intend to push this brand to the full, and if this is only a small selection of what i can do, then who knows what the future holds. It&#039;s a learning curve, and a lot of room to grow. I myself, cant wait. 
Hater&#039;s gonna hate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to everyone for the kind words, and everyone for the negative as well. I guess i cant always please everyone, and i&#8217;m sorry i am not doing it with enough originality. This is my 2nd collection, or even shall i say my first real collection seeing as the introductory pieces were just a 1 design t-shirt, but i would like to think i&#8217;ve expanded to bigger things.<br />
I kept with the &#8216;Triangles and Circles&#8217; because its something i have not used to its full potential yet. It was the original emblem we pushed before the first garment was even dropped, and its worked.<br />
Critism comes with everything i guess, and i can only do what i can do! I have a solid background, and a solid unit of support and i appreciate everyone for that. The collection so far has gone done insanely well and i&#8217;m now already pushing for the 003 collection which is due some time this Summer.<br />
If it&#8217;s still not good enough for you, then i guess i cant do much about that. I&#8217;m doing the same as everyone else, running a brand like i should be, and pushing garments i believe can do well. In the reality, not everyone will like it, and i take that with a pinch of salt. I&#8217;m the same with other brands. Not everyone can like it. Lets get over it and keep the bitching and slagging down. I appreciate all feedback, good or bad, but what i dont like to read is people seeming to slag it for its &#8216;un originality&#8217; or its &#8216;gay&#8217; name. Think what you think, but it wont give you any scene points for putting your negative approach in. Hate it, or dislike it, whatever you like, just back it up with a genuine reason. I intend to push this brand to the full, and if this is only a small selection of what i can do, then who knows what the future holds. It&#8217;s a learning curve, and a lot of room to grow. I myself, cant wait.<br />
Hater&#8217;s gonna hate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dark Nature Clothing &#8216;002&#8242; Collection by Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/2012/01/dark-nature-002-collection/comment-page-1/#comment-31846</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/?p=43595#comment-31846</guid>
		<description>@Dan you can&#039;t make a living ripping off other peoples designs.  Be real here.  Anyone can see there is nothing original coming from those brands.  

Again, who&#039;s top ten are they in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan you can&#8217;t make a living ripping off other peoples designs.  Be real here.  Anyone can see there is nothing original coming from those brands.  </p>
<p>Again, who&#8217;s top ten are they in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dark Nature Clothing &#8216;002&#8242; Collection by AD</title>
		<link>http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/2012/01/dark-nature-002-collection/comment-page-1/#comment-31838</link>
		<dc:creator>AD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/?p=43595#comment-31838</guid>
		<description>ywn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ywn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dark Nature Clothing &#8216;002&#8242; Collection by Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/2012/01/dark-nature-002-collection/comment-page-1/#comment-31837</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/?p=43595#comment-31837</guid>
		<description>@tyler i know for a fact that all 3 of those brands you just put down make a living doing it full time so they must be doing something rite eh.

And if puting a triangle in a circle is working hard to you then you need to work harder!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@tyler i know for a fact that all 3 of those brands you just put down make a living doing it full time so they must be doing something rite eh.</p>
<p>And if puting a triangle in a circle is working hard to you then you need to work harder!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dope Chef x Mikill Pane Collaboration by THE REAL</title>
		<link>http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/2012/01/dope-chef-x-mikill-pane/comment-page-1/#comment-31835</link>
		<dc:creator>THE REAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/?p=43556#comment-31835</guid>
		<description>like it. dope chef has potential. plus 4 variations is fine. its only black, grey and white.. some people like black, some like white, some like tees, some like sweats.. they have a choice.

p.s. its not like johnny cupcakes....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like it. dope chef has potential. plus 4 variations is fine. its only black, grey and white.. some people like black, some like white, some like tees, some like sweats.. they have a choice.</p>
<p>p.s. its not like johnny cupcakes&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dark Nature Clothing &#8216;002&#8242; Collection by Grim</title>
		<link>http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/2012/01/dark-nature-002-collection/comment-page-1/#comment-31830</link>
		<dc:creator>Grim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedailystreet.co.uk/?p=43595#comment-31830</guid>
		<description>Another good honest report from Adam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another good honest report from Adam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

